Are banar sena really monkeys? Ramayans explain

As from title you have known that we are going to talk about Ramayana and sneak peek on its some aspect, banars or say hanuman. Many of us have confusion about banar, we will try to explain on banar and its link with scientific proof.

You have to know Ramayana, Mahabharata Is not a mythology, it’s a history.

First we have to know, banar are not today’s monkey. In literal meaning, ban means forest and nar means man, so banar means man like beings living in forest.Neanderthals are like todays human comparably short and stronger and look alike monkey but not total, you can see picture below. They have been extinct many years ago. We will compare contrast between banar sena with Neanderthals.


We have been reading Ramayana and we know banar sena can speak properly and communicate with people and we know monkey can’t speak because of its mouth shape but Neanderthal can. We know banar sena used to live in cave but monkey lives in tree not in cave, while it was found that the fossils of Neanderthal are found in cave and proof of them living in cave. Banar sena were more intelligent as modern human. We have to know monkey was called Bandar not banar. We also know they are alike as human as and more powerful than human. The size of monkey is not as big as mentioned in Ramayana as banar. We also know hanuman is great having knowledge about universe and can learn new things. Hanuman, Sugriva, Bali like banar had married to human and it was found todays human have some DNA of Neanderthal. The bone of Neanderthal was found in near of kishkinda.

Since Neanderthal had all the character like banar sena or say banar sena has all character of Neanderthal, we can say banara sena is none other than Neanderthal. What do you think about it? Comment down. And if anyone said banar sena or hanuman a money, you can provide the fact or share to them. You can check my other post on this site.

 


Comments